Im Garten der Kunst
 Home
 Personal
Click here to leave

leerstelleHans-Dieter Gelfert, Im Garten der Kunst. Versuch einer empirischen Ästhetik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1998.

deusmlPreis und Verfügbarkeit bei amazon.de prüfen - hier klicken!

 

Das Buch beschäftigt sich mit drei Fragen:

  • Was unterscheidet Kunst von Nicht-Kunst?
  • Was unterscheidet bedeutende Kunstwerke von weniger bedeutenden?
  • Was bewirkt Kunst im Betrachter?

Nach einer kurzen Zusammenfassung ästhetischer Theorien von Plato bis zur Gegenwart folgt eine Analyse ästhetischer Lust, ihrer Ursachen, ihres Mechanismus und ihrer anthropologischen Funktion. Es schließt sich ein Erklärungsmodell an, das auf Erkenntnissen der Neurologie und Informationstheorie basiert. On this basis it defines the two characteristic forms of aesthetic pleasure produced by art as 'stilled expectancy' and 'ritualised gratification', the former corresponding to Kant's 'disinterested pleasure', the latter to Aristotle's catharsis. These two modes distinguish art from its three most powerful rivals, namely advertising, sports and pornography. Whereas advertising stimulates 'unstilled' expectancy, sports and pornography produce 'unritualised' gratification. According to the book's working definition, art is the class of objects that are (1) perceivable by the senses, (2) purposeless, (3) fully formalised, (4) illusionary and (5) provided with a je ne sais quoi. In successive chapters the book then goes on to discuss the fine arts, music and poetry in the light of these theoretical premises. The last chapter is dedicated to the state of postmodern art, the characterstics of which are the refusal of the 'stilled' and the 'cathartic' forms of aesthetic pleasure, and also of the traditional concept of artistic perfection. The je ne sais quoi that formerly was brought about in the vertical dimension by excellence is now achieved horizontally by the uniqueness of a gimmick. This seems to be the radical conclusion drawn from democracy. The tragic thing, however, is that art by trying to be democratic has lost its public and has turned into an even more exclusive game of a cultural elite.

(Vollständige deutsche Version der Zusammenfassung folgt in Kürze)

siehe auch:

[Home] [Personal]

(c) 2004 by Axel Gelfert
Impressum & Haftungsausschluss
: siehe Hinweis auf Homepage www.gelfert.net
Legal Disclaimer
: visit link on our homepage www.gelfert.net

This website is (c) 2002 by Axel Gelfert